SPA Series Part 1: How To Negotiate M&A Deals in Finland
So this is the outlook what is about to follow:
1. PARTIES, DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
2. SALE AND PURCHASE OF SHARES
3. PURCHASE PRICE, EARN-OUTS AND ADJUSTMENTS
5. BUYER’S WARRANTIES
6. SELLER’S WARRANTIES
7. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
8. POST-COMPLETION OBLIGATIONS
9. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
10. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED
12. CO-OPERATION AND COMPETITION
13. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS
16. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES
18. EFFECT OF COMPLETION
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
21. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS
22. GOVERNING LAW AND DISPUTES
25. DISCLOSURE LETTER AND SOME WORDS ON OTHER SCHEDULES
26. SOME ADVICE ON “BOILERPLATE CLAUSES”
Some sections will be divided in subsections as it may be too difficult to fit all information on warranties, for example, to a reasonable size of one blog. Another theme that is divided to several smaller subsections will be purchase price, which is naturally needed to go through different variations from locked-box to earn-outs.
We decided to start the blog to share experiences of seasoned M&A lawyers. Both I Jan Lindberg, being active in technology, outsourcing and intellectual property deals and Mika J. Lehtimäki, who is a very well-known figure in banking & finance, have led several domestic and cross-border transactions and during our careers we have learned most tricks and intricacies from practice. There has not been a single book or guide which could assist a young lawyer in his or her journey to the wonderful world of M&A which is an issue we wanted to fix. It is not so long ago (most likely 2001) I was doing my first seed investment to a small technology-based company and I went to the chamber of my tutor just to ask what an earth is a disclosure letter and how should I “qualify warranties”.
The small but invaluable piece of advise I received then was still valid last year when I was leading a large financing round relating to a contemplated green technology or should I say cleantech production facility, or representing a Finnish company in the divestment of their operations abroad. As for Mika, he still remembers his first M&A deal in 1999 negotiating against one of the grand-old-men of Finnish corporate law. Although not a pleasant lesson, something that put him first in the deep end of the world of M&A tactics and trickery.
We will focus in our posts also on the negotiation process as it is one of the most critical issues in any M&A deal. It is young lawyer’s typical problem that one too easily sabotages the deal while experienced negotiator may come up with excellent workarounds that still lead to win-win deal for both parties.
Main target audience of this blog series is those already having experience on M&A and perhaps have participated negotiations already. Legal education is not necessary so we also think that our thoughts could be useful for financial advisors, CFOs and management in general involved in these kinds of cases.
Finally before we start it is important to note that contract language used in this blog is mainly intended to illustrate the point in question so we have not tried to formulate bullet-proof language in that respect. It should be noted that precise drafting is one of the most important issues in particular in cross-border deals where contractual interpretation is not necessarily based on “intention of the parties”.
Any questions and comments are warmly welcome and if you wish to submit particular comments to any specific topic or you have been wondering some point raised in a previous case, let us know and hopefully we are able to provide guidance on those as well.